Sunday, February 21, 2021

Upcoming Aquarimax Livestream!!!

That's right, on Tuesday (the 23rd), 5:30 PM (MST), I'll be doing a livestream with Rus Wilson of Aquarimax Pets! 😁 Feel free to drop in on the livestream, and leave questions in the live chat, which we'll try to answer as best we can! 😄 

Here's the stream preview, click the little bell in the bottom right corner to "Set Reminder" and get notified when the stream starts on YouTube. 🙂 And subscribe to Aquarimax Pets on YouTube for awesome videos on various invertebrates and other pet animals, as well as interviews with other hobbyists! 😉


If the preview here is a little wonky, click this link to see it directly on YouTube. 

Well, that's gonna do it for this PSA, I hope to see y'all on Tuesday! 😁 For those of you who can't make it live, the stream will be uploaded to Aquarimax's YouTube channel afterwards, so you can watch it then as well.
Anyways, see you in the next post! 😉

Thursday, February 18, 2021

Melyroidea magnifica Eusocial? Probably Not...

Alright, I'm posting about this because this article seems to have gone viral in my bug circles on social media, (and how could it not, they're such pretty roaches!). While Melyroidea magnifica is certainly an amazing species, and a convincing blister beetle mimic, the claims in the most recent paper about them, "Neotropical Melyroidea group cockroaches reveal various degrees of (eu)sociality" are absolute BS. The author, Peter Vrsansky, is notorious in the cockroach taxonomist community for publishing papers with crazy theories and very little substantial evidence to support them. Most of his work is on fossil roach species, where he often claims they had ecological behaviors he has no way of confirming, but he occasionally dips into the taxonomy and behavioral studies of extant members of the Blattodea as well...

The cockroach in question, Melyroidea magnifica. ©Thierry Garcia
In the case of Melyroidea, no different castes were ever observed, I don't believe cooperative brood care was properly documented either, and the pale "queen" individuals they refer to in this paper (which they never collected for observation conveniently) were most likely just freshly molted, normal adults. If you look at the pictures of the nymphs they took in the paper, most of them appear to be subadults, so everytime they checked on the "colony" in the wild, and saw a "queen", what they most likely were seeing were different, freshly molted adults, simple as that. 

A figure from the paper, ©Anton Sorokin & Adrian Tejedor
The evidence provided for their theory that this species is eusocial is dubious at best, and there are a plethora of other issues in the paper, from the fact that they failed to describe the genitalia of the "new" Melyroidea species they described, (which may actually just be a color morph of M.magnifica), to the claims that Melyroidea don't have proper chewing mouthparts, yet were observed eating algae and supposedly made their own tunnels in rotten wood... How the heck do they eat if they can't chew, suction? Quite a stretch indeed, considering no other roach species deviates from the normal chewing mouthparts, except for 1st and maybe 2nd instars of certain species of genera like Perisphaerus and Pseudoglomeris. This "scientist" and his team unfortunately seem to know very little about cockroaches, and I have yet to see a single other cockroach taxonomist that agrees with all the findings of this paper. 
For more info and discussion between actual cockroach taxonomists, and their doubts about the paper, please see this post here.

Anyways, that's gonna do it for this post, I've talked about this all on social media before but had yet to make a blog post about it, figured I would do so now. 🙂 I hope everyone enjoyed, thanks for reading, stay safe, and I'll see you all in the next post! 😉

Wednesday, February 17, 2021

A Short Guide to Pests & Other Microfauna

Bit of a different post, (one that I'll add more pictures to over time), today I'd like to just go over some of the more commonly encountered pests and other microfauna people will find in their invertebrate enclosures, as well as some tips on deterring them. I hope this post proves helpful and informative to invertebrate keepers of all kinds! 😁

Mites:

Perhaps the most notorious of the pests one can encounter in this hobby, there are many different mites that can breed in invertebrate cultures, some of which are harmful, others more neutral or even benign. 


Grain mites (Acarus siro)

Grain mites, free roaming feeding stage.
The worst of the pests mites IMO, and one of the most commonly encountered. These gross, white, spherical, slow-moving mites are attracted to all manner of decaying organic matter, and in captivity are most commonly attracted to rotting grain products, as well as rotting produce and dead invertebrates. Basically, any leftover food your inverts don't eat is fair game, and a small portion of food can sustain hundreds or thousands of mites. Their free moving stage is their most harmless one, but as their numbers reach plague proportions, and either they feel too crowded or conditions become unfriendly towards them, they'll latch on to any solid surfaces they can (including your inverts), and enter what's called their "hypopus stage", at which point they become living, immobile suction cups. They'll stay in their hypopus stage until they sense conditions are good to let go and become free roaming again. They can clog up mouthparts, leg joints, and breathing spiracles on the invertebrates they cling to, and can severely stress and even kill inverts in this way. 

Grain mites in their hypopus stage, clinging to a Carabus nemoralis beetle
These mites prefer humid conditions and are attracted to uneaten leftovers, as well as dead invert bodies. Their eggs can be found in most grain based pet foods and mites can also be clinging onto inverts you just acquired, and thus are difficult, if not impossible to prevent from coming into a collection at some point. They can be controlled by keeping enclosures dryer and better ventilated, reducing the amount of food you feed your inverts so that there are less leftovers, removing leftover food after 48 hours, or by using predatory mites in your enclosures. A cleaner crew mixture of springtails and Oribatid mites can also take up the same ecological niche grain mites inhabit and prevent them from reaching plague proportions in an enclosure.

Once grain mite numbers reach the thousands and they start clinging to your inverts and the sides of the enclosure in their hypopus stage, or if wandering mites completely fill the substrate and cover the walls of the enclosure, you'll just need to completely clean out the enclosure, replace the substrate and everything. There's no good way of controlling them at that point, you'll need to start fresh and take preventative measures for the next time.

Recently I've come across a similar type of mite, which I've been calling Yellow Mites. This is a new species for me, they act much the same as grain mites, but are smaller, yellow, and have a matte exoskeleton texture rather than a glossy one. Prevention methods are much the same, though they only seem to bother very tiny inverts, and aren't as prolific as grain mites. No idea as to their identity unfortunately.


Oribatid mites (Oribatida)

Sometimes referred to as "soil mites" or "beetle mites" due to their rounded, hard shelled appearance, these are common in humid invert enclosures in the hobby, but a lot of people might not even be aware they have them in their collections. They are dark, hard shelled, secretive mites that you'll generally only notice much if their populations are very high, which doesn't happen all that often compared to other mite species. Oribatids are typically a dark red color, though species can range in coloration from reddish brown to black. 
I consider these a lesser evil and technically beneficial in some cases, they take up the exact same ecological niche as grain mites do, eating leftover supplemental foods and such, however they don't have a hypopus stage, and generally shy away from larger inverts, which makes them a lot less dangerous than grain mites. 

Red Oribatids in various stages of development, alongside silver springtails
However, they can reach very high populations if uneaten supplemental food is touching the substrate consistently, (they have difficulty getting into food bowls, unlike grain mites), and can potentially swarm food that touches the substrate before your inverts have the chance to eat it, causing your inverts to starve... They'll also stress out smaller invert species if their numbers are too high with frequent tactile contact, and the food swarming, and I've had them nearly wipe out small Ectobiid roach cultures before.

Red Oribatids
All that's needed to prevent them from reaching high populations is to not leave uneaten food on or in your substrate, and use food bowls of some sort of possible. If they reach plague populations, then your only option is to remove and replace/sterilize all the substrate and hides in the enclosure, they can handle dry spells better than grain mites, don't mind high ventilation levels, and predatory mites won't eat them, they're too hard shelled. However, they're much slower breeding than grain mites, so their numbers take a while to build up after you've rid an enclosure of them. 


Predatory mites (Stratiolaelaps scimitus, ex. Hypoaspis miles)

Stratiolaelaps scimitus ©Isopod Ranch
These are perhaps one of the most beneficial mite types ever, mainly because they eat other mites, and fungus gnats too! But, they can also cause stress to some invertebrates via constant tactile contact during their population booms, and can even severely stress or kill smaller invert species, (such as springtails, ant crickets, certain Dipterans, etc.).
However, they only tend to stress larger inverts out during their big population booms, which tend to be fairly short lived, as they run out of food at that point pretty quickly, and their populations crash for a little while, until the pest populations in those enclosures go back up. Supposedly they'll eat detritus and random decaying organic material when prey items are unavailable or in short supply, and this is probably what allows them to continue on in enclosures for a while even after most of their prey sources have been exhausted, but they definitely do not thrive on that diet.

Stratiolaelaps scimitus ©Isopod Ranch
As for preventing these mites from entering your collection or a specific enclosure, say a springtail culture (which is an all-you-can-eat buffet for predatory mites), that's rather difficult. These mites are very mobile, can climb smooth surfaces, and thus jump cultures with ease. These mites seem to prefer humid, minimally ventilated setups, so letting things dry out or increasing airflow greatly may dwindle their numbers down. However, that alone might not completely prevent them from popping up in cultures, and generally if there is an enclosure with a food source for them, that is somewhat close to containers that you know have predatory mites in them, it's safe to assume they'll find a way into that enclosure sooner or later.

Stratiolaelaps scimitus
There are other predatory mite species, some that prefer drier conditions, some that are much bigger than Stratiolaelaps scimitus, some that may be far more harmful to a wider variety of invertebrates, etc., but S.scimitus is by far the most commonly encountered predatory mite species in the invertebrate hobby. 


Flies:

One of the more annoying pests one can have in the invertebrate hobby, though they're often more annoying to us humans than they are to our pets... With only one commonly encountered exception.


Fruit flies (Drosophilidae)

I've never actually had an issue with fruit flies as pests, and I assume most people who claim to have "fruit fly" infestations in this hobby are mistaking fungus gnats or phorid flies for fruit flies... However, if you actually do have a fruit fly problem, then it's probably due to rotting fruits in your enclosure(s)... Remove leftover fruit as it starts to spoil, and/or feed fruits in lower quantities so as to eliminate leftovers altogether, and your fruit fly problems should go away. If for some reason that doesn't work, consider using predatory mites or BTI, (which I'll go more into depth on in the fungus gnat section below).


Fungus gnats (Sciaridae)


Probably the most commonly encountered Dipterans in pet invertebrate cultures, the nearly transparent larvae of these small flies feed on a wide variety of decaying organic matter in/on moist substrates, including rotten wood, dead leaves, compost, leftover supplemental foods, dead invertebrates, etc., with a particular taste for rotten wood and leaves it seems. This can prove annoying, especially for beetle and millipede breeders, who need a humid, very organically rich substrate for breeding, which is a fungus gnat haven. They're commonly encountered in smaller numbers in a variety of invertebrate enclosures, but scarab beetle and millipede enclosures can produce clouds of fungus gnats in a very short time frame, not very pleasant for most of us breeders, considering they seem to love flying up human noses and into eyes as well... 

They very seldom stress or harm larger invertebrates directly, however they can eat vast quantities of rotten wood and leaf litter in a very short amount of time, which will lead to scarab larvae and millipedes starving unless you replace the substrate for them. Mostly they're just annoying to deal with and to inhale as you're doing maintenance, and unfortunately they are a pest nearly EVERY invert hobbyist deals with, due to the fact that there are fungus gnat species nearly everywhere, and they can fit through most window screen, so they will inevitably find their way indoors and then seek out humid areas to lay their eggs, (like in your enclosures). They may also be brought in with unsterilized wood and leaf litter materials, as well as potted plants, (they feed on the potting soil).


As far as preventing fungus gnats from taking hold or reaching plague proportions in your enclosures, there are a few things that can be done. They despise dryness, and so letting the substrate dry out a bit can kill a lot of their larvae off. Additionally, if you remove leftovers frequently, you can limit their numbers in enclosures where supplemental foods are their main source of nutrition. 
However, in humid enclosures with a nutritionally rich substrate, your best lines of defense against fungus gnats are predatory mites, or the bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis. Predatory mites can decimate fungus gnat populations given a little time, and are the probably the main reason I've never had big fungus gnat issues. Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis, (BTI) is a strain of bacteria commonly sold as "Mosquito dunks" or "Gnatrol", that when ingested, paralyzes and kills various fly larvae. It seems to only target fly larvae, and so is harmless and safe to use in most pet invertebrate enclosures, many keepers swear by it. However, it seems a less sustainable option than predatory mites, at least, you'll need to keep on buying BTI again and again as you kill off all the gnats and they inevitably come back, whereas with predatory mites you should always have some of those in your collection unless you try to exterminate them.
Roachcrossing also sells fungus gnat specialist rove beetles, Dalotia coriaria, which can be quite effective in feeding on and removing fungus gnats from enclosures, much like predatory mites.


Phorid flies (Phoridae)

Sometimes called "hump-backed flies" or "scuttleflies", these little pests are most commonly encountered by roach breeders, and are larger than most fungus gnats. They feed mainly on dead invertebrates, with a particular fondness for meaty, somewhat soft bodied ones, (like roaches). While they may seem like harmless scavengers, females will actually lay eggs on live roaches that are either weak or injured, and their larvae will sometimes start consuming and then kill said roaches...
In large numbers their feeding activity can turn roach bodies, frass and leftover food into mud essentially, which when moist gets anaerobic and can cause further die off in roach colonies, further fueling the flies and making the situation even worse.
They really seem to highly stress out roaches and can turn a filthy, crowded roach colony into a filthier, but far less populated roach colony pretty quickly if left unchecked... They essentially take a bad situation and make it much worse. 

Predatory mites and BTI might work to thin their numbers out, and phorids don't handle dryness the best, but thinning their numbers temporarily isn't good enough, and the larvae can survive temporary dryness if they're inside a plump rotting roach body. The best thing to do when you have a phorid fly infestation is to completely clean the enclosure, remove and replace all substrate, and either replace or sterilize all hides to get rid of any pupae attached to them. Staying on top of things and removing dead bodies from your enclosures weekly as needed will eliminate their food source, preventing phorid flies from taking hold. So long as you keep your enclosures clean of body buildups, you shouldn't have big phorid fly infestations.


Nematodes:

The nematodes most will be familiar with are somewhat uncommonly encountered, tiny worms that pop up in enclosures rich with organic matter, hitchhikers on unsterilized materials. Most varieties encountered in captivity are fairly harmless, though if their numbers somehow reached plague proportions, I can definitely see them stressing out certain invertebrates, and it's possible in large enough numbers they could damage molting invertebrates and attempt to feed on them... But I've rarely seen such reports, and nematodes seem somewhat easy to eradicate by replacing, sterilizing or completely drying out the infested substrate/hides and cleaning out the enclosure.

Horsehair worms are a type of parasitic nematode that some people may encounter, typically found in wild caught Orthopterans, as well as related insect groups. When they reach maturity, they force their hosts to seek out water to drown themselves in, after which the several inch long, very thin worm comes bursting out, looking for mates in the same water source. Since the rest of their life cycle is quite complex, requires a water source and suitable aquatic hosts for their younger larval stages, this is a pest one will only ever encounter with WC specimens, and can not be spread from pet bug to pet bug in captivity without a lot of effort put into doing so. 


Fungi:

Entomophagous fungi

Most truly entomophagous fungi are very host specific and will not be encountered by the average hobbyist, and won't usually spread from species to species either.

However, protein hungry Trichoderma spp. molds can grow within the tracheal and gut systems of some insects, and if left unchecked will kill and consume the infected individuals, acting much like a true entomophagous fungus. This mold can decimate cultures, and is usually brought into cultures via unsterilized materials (leaf litter, rotten wood, soil, sphagnum peat, etc.). Infected insects will often halt all reproductive behavior if they're adults, and individuals from every life stage will die in time, then become rapidly covered in low growing, fuzzy green mold, or white mold that turns green. Oddly, only insects are effected by this mold, isopods seem completely unaffected.
Now, there are many Trichoderma mold species that are completely harmless to insects and will instead feed on other molds and decaying organic matter, including dead insects... So white and/or green mold growing on dead invertebrates alone isn't enough to tell if your culture has the harmful, protein hungry kinds of Trichoderma. Only if you are experiencing very high, otherwise unexplainable die offs in your cultures, followed by the dead individuals being rapidly consumed in mold, can you confirm that your cultures are infected with a protein hungry Trichoderma.

As far as preventative measures go, all you can really do is just thoroughly heat sterilize any and all materials collected outdoors before use in enclosures, such as rotten wood, leaf litter, bark, etc., as well as sphagnum peat and probably some composts that are stored outdoors. Make sure wild insects you catch are kept in sort of a quarantine away from the rest of your invertebrates, as wild insects can be infected with these types of fungi and then die and disperse the fungal spores in the enclosure they're in. Cleaner crews alone are not enough to stop this fungus, as even if one or two spores are consumed by one of your insects, that's enough to infect your whole culture. 

To rid infected insects of protein hungry Trichoderma, you need to keep them bone dry, well ventilated, and offer no forms of protein whatsoever, only fruits and veggies for food. If this is done correctly for a couple weeks to a month, then the fungus should die out completely in the infected individuals. However, some moisture loving insects won't be able to handle this, and may die as a result. But kept humid and hydrated, the fungus will continue to persist in their bodies and eventually kill them anyways. 


Food molds

Food molds come in a variety of growth shapes and colors, and there are countless species the hobbyist may encounter. Most food molds are harmless to the majority of cultured invertebrates, just unsightly. However, some of the more stringy mold types can trap and entangle tiny invertebrates, killing them, so it is best to remove those types when seen. Plus, when food molds over, it's generally a good sign that it's time to remove and replace said foods with fresh foods, lest other pests take advantage of the leftovers as the mold dies out.

Aspergillus sp. on chick feed.
These molds are greatly controlled by cleaner crews such as springtails, which will eat the molds themselves, and to a lesser extent isopods, which may eat the molds but more importantly will eat leftovers the mold would grow on. Removing leftover food 48 hours after feeding usually prevents significant mold growth as well.


Leucocoprinus spp. & other mushroom mycelium

Leucocoprinus mycelium
These types of fungi are more annoying than strictly harmful, as they turn substrate into solid mats of mycelium that a lot of burrowing invertebrate species have difficulty digging through. This can highly stress out burrowing inverts, and if it grows fast enough it can trap individuals that had made molting cells/chambers deep in the substrate. However, non-burrowing inverts, specifically detritivores, usually aren't too disturbed by the growth, and can wait the fungus out until it inevitably withers and dies out. (though this can take months). Some other non-burrowing inverts are stressed out by the fungus though, and will require a complete change of substrate and enclosure cleaning as a result. 

Leucocoprinus mycelium
Preventing this fungus requires you to sterilize all substrates before use, usually it comes into collections via dormant spores in coconut fiber, sphagnum peat, potting soil, etc., which will all need to be heat sterilized before use if you want to be 100% sure they're fungus free. Merely drying the mycelium out doesn't usually kill it, and it will revive when moistened again. Isopods and springtails won't touch it. Once it pops up, in order to completely rid an enclosure of it you'll need to completely replace (or thoroughly sterilize) the infected substrate, and then wash out the enclosure itself with warm water and a little soap or something. Or, just wait a few months and let it run it's course and die out, whatever works for your inverts.


Bacteria:

Besides the Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (BTI) mentioned in the fly section for fungus gnat and phorid fly control, there's really only one noticeable type of bacteria that commonly shows up in collections and has any affect on cultured invertebrates. 


Serratia spp.

Rotting, Serratia covered chick feed next to fresh chick feed
Serratia bacteria feed upon decomposing invertebrates (particularly soft bodied ones like roaches), and leftover food, and turns infected material a shade of bright pink/red. It rarely affects living individuals in any way other than potential discoloration, and can be removed from enclosures with a simple cleaning in my experience. Not much of a cause for concern in invertebrate cultures, but a curious phenomenon some people may encounter and worry is fungus related or something.

Serratia covered chick feed

Springtails:

While technically any large, very prolific springtail could stress out slow growing/breeding, sensitive or otherwise finicky invert species, there's only one I consider a true pest...


Tropical Pink Springtails (Sinella curviseta)

Sinella curviseta
This species is popular in the pet hobby for use as a cleaner crew, and perhaps for some species, they work really well. However, I mostly deal with slow growing, slow breeding, sensitive roaches and other finicky invertebrates, and for me this species has proven just as much a pest as grain mites... They are just FAR too prolific, and when they reach those numbers, they can really stress other inverts out with the constant tactile contact. Not only that, but they can also swarm food and prevent small, fragile species like tiny Ectobiidae roaches from eating... They're also really good at jumping from culture to culture, and can handle a wide range of conditions.
I have gone to great lengths to prevent this species from popping up in my roach enclosures, and really the only way to eradicate this species from your collection is to completely clean out all infested enclosures and carefully move back inhabitants without re-introducing any springtails back in... Best to just not get them as cleaner crews in the first place IMO.


Well, I hope this guide proved useful, I may update it as time goes on and I think of more pests to add, or maybe I'll make a new post in the future if need be, we'll see. Thanks for reading, stay safe, and I'll see you all next time! 😉

Tuesday, February 9, 2021

Myrmecoblatta Blunders & Hormetica Pics

Well, unfortunately I'm very sad to report that I am down to one last Myrmecoblatta wheeleri female. 😭 They were doing OK again in their new digs, and one of the females looked so freakin plump, but then those HORRIBLE yellow mites came back, and this time I didn't notice until it was too late, all my Myrmecoblatta were completely covered in the damn things... 
Then, as a last resort move, I placed them in my Asiablatta enclosure, because it was inoculated with predatory mites and I hoped they'd help the roaches out and eat all the mites. There's only half a dozen Asiablatta in there, which seemed pretty chill and I thought they'd make decent tankmates, but then I checked on them a couple days later and there was only the one female left, (though it seemed most of the mites had left her)... So either the stress was just too much for the two male and one other female Myrmecoblatta, or the Asiablatta ate them... And I'm starting to think it may have been the latter, given the surviving female has a little blemish on her pronotum that wasn't there before. 😭

I then moved her back to her old enclosure, which I had inoculated with predatory mites, and I hadn't seen any of those yellow mites in there for a week or two, so I thought it was safe. But those little buggers appear to be persistent AF, and I checked the enclosure the other day to find my last female covered in the things... So I've moved her to a quarantine setup with paper towel substrate, which I'll replaced daily for a few days, which worked to (mostly) rid them of the mites last time...

I believe my biggest blunder was trying to control the microfauna, specifically predatory mites. While the Myrmecoblatta did very well before I tried heating them up and thus inoculated their enclosure with microfauna, I think that the one species of microfauna I was the most afraid of stressing them out, the predatory mites, probably wouldn't actually have stressed them much considering their super flat build. Predatory mites normally only stress out inverts that are less flat and that they can actually climb up the legs of, like darkling beetles and stuff, because they climb on anything that moves IME. Whereas Myrmecoblatta are so flat that they're on the mites' level already, and they probably wouldn't be stressed much by them since they won't touch their legs. So if I'd let their enclosure become inoculated with predatory mites from the start, then they would never have had the problems they did with the yellow mites, which act like grain mites, which severely affect Myrmecoblatta precisely because they're so flat, the roaches can't help but pick up the mites as they walk over food and around the enclosure, and so the mites just absolutely coat their mouthparts and limbs when they enter their hyposus stage... 😩

I also kept them too cool and minimally ventilated initially, if I had kept them warmer and well ventilated from the start, AND inoculated their enclosure with predatory mites, they'd have bred by now I think. Overall I tried too hard to keep them like I thought I should have kept my Myrmecophilus ant crickets, when I probably should have tried to keep them more like Compsodes/Nocticola, while also giving them mold to feed on... Though that is SUCH a hard thing to do when the enclosure has a lot of springtails, another reason why there should have been predatory mites in their enclosure, less springs...
Also, moving them in with the Asiablatta as a last resort was unbelievably stupid, I don't know WHAT I was thinking, I should have just put them in quarantine again like I'm doing with this last female. 🙄 Sometimes I feel like slapping past me... 

Anyways, I honestly think what I'm going to do with this last M.wheeleri female is keep her in quarantine until the mites are gone, and then honestly I'll probably set her up in a well ventilated, warm enclosure still with a moist, crumpled paper towel substrate, and keep swapping that out every week or so. With any luck, this will prevent harmful mite/springtail buildups, while also allowing for mold growth should the female need it to feed.
Hopefully with adequate heat and ventilation, and no freakin mites, she'll actually oviposit in such a setup, and I can isolate and remove oothecae as I find them into a setup that will either already be inoculated with a more stable microfauna variety, complete with predatory mites and hopefully none of those yellow mites or grain mites, or another quarantine style setup.

Anyways, that's what's going on with those, I feel really bad for making the mistakes I did, but hopefully, by some miracle, I can get this last female to produce some ooths and hatch them, we'll see... I'll be very surprised if I can though. 

Also, just a brief update on my Hormetica strumosa. So far they're doing good, one of the females is SUPER plump and gravid looking, and I expect she'll give birth in a month or two. 😁 The other female has been staying underground mostly, and the other day she surfaced and I noticed she's much less plump than the definitely gravid female, so I'm worried she may not have actually mated, (I removed the males from their enclosure only a couple weeks or so after they all matured, to prevent any potential filicide).

So, I've plopped one of the males back into their enclosure, I'll leave him in there for a couple weeks and then remove him again, which will hopefully ensure that that one female is indeed fertilized, and gets to incubating her brood soon. She may already be mated and for some reason is just taking a longer time to plump up, but I don't wanna take any chances. 

Anyways, here are a couple random pics of an adult male pronotum:



Well, that's gonna do it for today's post, thanks for reading, stay safe, and I'll see you all next time! 😉

Sunday, February 7, 2021

Female Roach Maturations!

Finally, one of my female Panesthia angustipennis cognata "Cambodia" has matured! 😁 I was interested to see that her pronotum doesn't differ much from the males', though she is more bulky than the males for sure. 

Here are some pics of her:














Some people asked me about their size, saying they looked big in my photos, so I decided to get some pictures of this female on my hand. As you can see, they're not very big, more of a medium sized roach IMO, (some might consider this small, but I routinely work with micro roaches that make these look like giants LOL). 
Fingers crossed they get to breeding now, it'll be a long wait I'm sure, but I'm really looking forward to getting babies from this species! 😁

Also, my second Hemithyrsocera vittata has matured, the one I was hoping was a male. Took a couple days, but I finally got to see it's ventral segments, and I can confirm that it's definitely, 100%, another female. 🙃 But hey, there's two other subadults in there now, hopefully outta those two one is a male, (and hopefully they hurry the heck up so my two current adult females don't die without mating... 😅). If not, then I'm screwed lol...

Anyways, that's gonna do it for this post, thanks for reading, hope everyone enjoyed, stay safe, and I'll see you all next time! 😉

Friday, February 5, 2021

Blatticulture Taxonomy PSA: US "Panchlora nivea" = Several Different Panchlora spp.

Oh man, there's a lot to unpack here... So, long time hobbyist Kyle Kandillian, owner of the well known website Roachcrossing, has started becoming more consistent in his service and on getting back to people again, and has also started taking orders at a reasonable rate and has been consistent with actually filling them out again, which is great. On top of that though, he has opened a can of worms in discovering that not all "Panchlora nivea" established in the Southern US are actually P.nivea... Or at least, they're not the same as whatever the old hobby P.nivea are, (which either come from FL or Cuba). 

See, Panchlora are established in many of the southern states here in the USA, and while the old P.nivea hobby stock (of unknown origin) is still commonly available, some people have still been collecting wild Panchlora in their area to breed, just because it's free and fun to start up colonies from new locales I guess, (though they seldom LIST the locales when selling them, which is gonna be a big problem now). For whatever reason, despite the fact that many different Panchlora species have been caught at ports of entry on produce and plants being brought into the country from Central and South America, all green Panchlora established in the US have just been historically identified as "Panchlora nivea".
However, hobbyist Satchell Watts-Ker has collected Panchlora from his state of Alabama and introduced them to the hobby, and when Kyle compared the subgenital plates (last ventral segments) of adult males of Satchell's "Tuscaloosa, Alabama" strain and his old hobby P.nivea (descended from Orin Mcmonigle's stock), he discovered that the subgenital plates of the two looked completely different, and they were indeed two different species of Panchlora.

So, this begs a LOT of questions... 

  • First of all, just how many Panchlora species are established in the wild in the US?
  • How many different species and locales are circulating in the US hobby? 
  • Have hybrids inadvertently been created, not just in captivity due to people adding "new blood" to their cultures (which is just NEVER a good idea it seems), but in the wild where different species' invasive ranges may overlap? 
  • Or, are these species that have naturally overlapping ranges in their native habitats, and thus have natural hybridization barriers in their morphology?
  • Are the hobby P.nivea even really P.nivea? What is their origin locality, FL, Cuba?
  • And what exactly ARE the sp. "Tuscaloosa - AL"?

What we really, really need are for people to start labeling any new WC strains they bring into the hobby with proper locality data, and it'd be nice if we could send specimens of all known distinct Panchlora strains to taxonomists for identification. People also need to STOP adding "new blood" from different sources to their colonies, because holy crap is that a bad idea considering we now know at least TWO different species are circulating in the US hobby as "P.nivea", and hybridization is still a very valid concern at this point in time. If your colony is crashing, just get a new one and start from scratch, PLEASE don't mix different stocks together. 

Here are some pictures, ©Roachcrossing, thanks to Kyle for letting me use them in this post:

Male hobby P.nivea on bottom, male P.sp. "Tuscaloosa - AL" on top
Male hobby P.nivea
Male P.sp. "Tuscaloosa - AL"
Male P.sp. "Tuscaloosa - AL" on left, male hobby P.nivea on right
Male and female hobby P.nivea, for comparison
So, there's simply a LOT to be done when it comes to figuring out the US Panchlora spp., most Panchlora in the US hobby probably are pure hobby P.nivea, but there are definitely several strains from different parts of the US in culture now that may or may not be the same species, so labeling everything with locality data is super important at this point, as well as getting pictures of the subgenital plates of the males of all the different localities.
It's a big headache when it comes to labeling, but kind of exciting too, because this means we have more Panchlora spp. in the hobby than we thought, and perhaps more not yet in culture to collect from around the US! 😄

Props to Kyle for noticing all this, and big thanks to him for letting me know and for letting me use his pics in this post. Since he's been consistent with orders again, giving people back what he owed them, taking better care of his collection, and overall cleaning up his act from the last few years, I'd recommend checking out his revamped website, lots of neat stuff happening there, and he's actually been using the blog section of his site frequently now. 🙂

That's gonna do it for this post, I hope everyone enjoyed and found this informative, thanks for reading, take care, and I'll see you all next time! 😉

Monday, February 1, 2021

Growing Giants

So, my Eleodes obscura sulcipennis larvae are starting to get pretty big, some of them are longer than their parents already, and so will probably pupate within the next couple months. Unfortunately though, it seems that the larvae of this species don't get along so well as they get larger, and they've been cannibalizing like crazy lately, despite having ample moisture and protein available. They're essentially ignoring their chick feed and instead chowing down on their molting cagemates... Whereas the few large larvae that I had isolated from the main enclosure into their own deli cups in an attempt to rear some really large individuals up a couple months ago have been doing great, and are still eating chick feed with no issue. 

So it seems that I'll likely need to start isolating more larvae asap, just to keep them alive, pretty annoying for an Eleodes, (especially such a prolific one). But oh well, this way I'll at least mostly get large adults I'm sure, since neither crowding nor food competition won't be an issue, both of which tend to stunt CB Eleodes. 

Anyways, here are some pictures of a large larva:






Looks smaller in the photos than it does in real life, it's the largest Eleodes larva I've ever seen, though still not quite the mass of some Zophobas atratus larvae I've reared. Fingers crossed I'm able to rear a good amount to adulthood, and hopefully they'll be big hefty adults too! 😄

One of my Macropanesthia rhinoceros nymphs has finally molted! 😁 Of the two nymphs I have, this one's been consistently fatter than the other and seems to be eating a lot more, which made me a little worried for the other, smaller nymph, but that one has finally started gaining some weight as well, so hopefully it'll molt somewhat soon too! 
Initially I was keeping these probably in the 65-67F° range, which was a bit too low I think, I've since bumped it up to 70-72F° or so, and they seem to be faring better ever since then. I saw that Peter's nymphs from the same brood were already molting to the next instar on his instagram (L5 I believe), so I knew mine were probably being kept too cool to develop at a decent speed. The bump in temperature seems to have gotten that one nymph to molt after a couple weeks, and the smaller one has been gaining weight in that time as well. 

I also removed some of the substrate from their enclosure a month ago, the substrate is only 3-4 mm deep now, usually when they're hiding under the cardboard in their enclosure they're resting on the bare plastic bottom. I've been misting the enclosure often, never letting it dry out too much, so it's not been an issue, and this nymph molted perfectly fine as a result! Once the other nymph molts, it should be safe for me to slightly increase substrate depth by a few mms again. 

Here are some pictures of my L5 beauty, both teneral and fully hardened! 😃

Teneral






One day later, hardened.









Such an amazing species, I really love their bulky, primitive look! 😍 Hopefully the other nymph molts soon, I'm so glad this one molted with no deformities! 😅 I'll definitely be sure to keep you all updated on these cuties! 

Anyways, that's gonna do it for today's post, thanks for reading, I hope everyone enjoyed, stay safe, and I'll see y'all next time! 😉